Should Artists Explain Their Own Work?

A Forest Painting and Reflections on Meaning and Mystery

I had almost decided to show this new painting without writing about it. The reason was a particularly pleasant encounter.

A customer, Robert, had ordered some prints online and came with his wife to collect them. He had an imposing presence, with a strength that seemed to come from his whole personality. At the time of our meeting in 2021, they lived in Dubai, and he had recently run a gallery in Spain whose architecture impressed me. Robert was also a painter. Although our work was quite different, we understood one another from the start. He knew Chinese antiques well, and since I surround myself with them, we had plenty to discuss.

He had looked at my blog and questioned my habit of discussing and interpreting my own paintings. He would never do that, he said: each viewer should discover a work’s mystery for themselves. Why explain it away?

I understand that view. When I started the blog, I also wondered whether writing about my own work made sense. Yet I do not think a few comments necessarily destroy its mystery. Nor does explaining a thought reveal how to reproduce the painting. The technique I have developed offers many possibilities, but it remains difficult to control.

So what is useful to a viewer? The title alone? Perhaps less than the context.

Environment

After a series of open landscapes—sky, mountains and water—I made this work as a counterpoint. It moves into the forest, a smaller, more mysterious world. The underlying ideas are similar, but the setting changes how they are felt.

Philosophical questions tend to enter my paintings, so I would like to mention one here. Paul Watzlawick’s familiar proposition can be translated as “One cannot not communicate”. In an interpersonal situation, even silence and inaction can convey something.[1]

Response

I remember the considerable response to his writing, although to me there is something of old wine in new bottles about the thought. Still, it offers a useful starting point. The moment I put a painting online, I am already communicating with you. I can leave it at the image or add some of the ideas that went into it. I find the latter worthwhile, provided viewers remain free to respond in their own way. What you see and what Ms Li in Shanghai sees may be quite different.

Applying that thought to a painting may shift attention from isolated forms to their relationships. How do the main elements respond to one another? What do the small details contribute? For me, these exchanges help the whole painting work. Abstract pictures that rely only on effects often leave me wanting a stronger thread of thought.

Conceptual Structure

What is the structure behind my own work? It is difficult to describe in a few sentences, and neither necessary nor possible to dissect every part. If a comment gives someone a way into a question such as communication, that is enough for me. The rest belongs to the viewer.

A Chinese signature might be read as a trick: “Look, I can write Chinese too!” It might also suggest an exchange between Chinese and Western ways of thinking within the painting. Neither response is something I can control.

I am also interested in whether something less obviously beautiful can say more than a conventionally beautiful subject. A bouquet of red roses makes an easy appeal to beauty; finding beauty in a rubbish bin is a different challenge. Someone else may find humility in the painting, or mindfulness. Writing about the work need not close those possibilities.


Footnotes

[1] Paul Watzlawick, Man kann nicht nicht kommunizieren: Das Lesebuch, edited by Trude Trunk, second edition, Hogrefe, 2016, pp. 13–14, “Die Unmöglichkeit, nicht zu kommunizieren”. See the published reading sample (PDF). The English sentence above is a translation of the short German formulation. Its application to painting here is my own. ↩

Related articles

Remembering a Landscape | Corona and the Sea: Painting the Invisible | Xieyi Painting

Explore Art & Writing

Art Portfolio → Featured Artworks → Arts & Philosophy Journal → All Articles

Explore Asian Art Essays for writing on Chinese painting, calligraphy, aesthetics and art history.

Available Artworks

Original works are available on FriedrichZettl.com and Saatchi Art


Posted

in

by

Comments

9 responses to “Should Artists Explain Their Own Work?”

  1. swabby429 avatar

    I believe it’s OK for the artist to comment on her/his works. This gives the viewer a starting point of reference. From this, the viewer can expand the vision onto one’s own point of view and feelings. I usually ponder a painting or drawing first, then read an artist’s commentary (if any).

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you! Yes, basically the same here. But as a painter, I’ve always been intrigued by how a painter came to what result. After reading van Gogh’s letters to his brother, for example, I found additional access to his works. And after studying Picasso’s Meninas series I then better understood the original painting by Velazquez.

      Of course one can also approach pictures completely openly, that’s just as ok.

      1. swabby429 avatar

        I’ve read a selection of van Gogh’s letters and they shed a lot of light on the thinking behind his paintings.

      2. Zettl Friedrich avatar

        When I was young I read the whole correspondence with Theo – 4 volums. blogging in an early stage, so to say. Now when we see his paintings then we feel so familiar with some aspects of his life and work…

  2. Martha Kennedy avatar

    The mystery of reality is part of reality itself; part of what it communicates. What if nothing really „means“ or „signifies“ anything beyond its presence? What if existence is sufficient to meaning? Your forest beckons, but the black shape between the viewer and the forest is very forbidding. Does that mean something? It means I should not think of going in? or that I need courage to enter? I don’t know, but I’m not going in. The thing about communication is its impossibility. I’ve painted things I don’t even understand, images that accurately depict places I had not (yet) seen. This is why I think when I approach the canvas, a lot more is going to happen than I know going in or might even know when I’m finished.

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      As always you sensed very well. I probably will add it to my Coroner series. Restrictions, fear, unknown dimension…..Need to think about that.
      Great topics you raised! Some day we will understand that all 😄

      1. Martha Kennedy avatar

        Definite a Corona painting. I felt that way many many times. Perfect.

  3. Ana Hernandez avatar

    Dear Fredrich Zettl,

    It is impossible to eliminate the “mystery”. In the first place, the artist always creates more than he/she has planned. The work is greater than the conception, yet personally I enjoy hearing about your musings as I see your pieces. In the second place we all bring a different world composed of personal experience, culture, and even mood of the moment to any viewing. I comment on the written word and I have never read an article or a story that has not led me to different depths upon each reading. Almost like contemplating infinity.

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Dear Ana Hernandez,

      Thank you for your answer and your wise words. I think, in principle, I see it the same way. If a viewer allows him/herself to get involved with a work, it her/is his culture, thinking, experience, mindset … that show her/him something, which she/he then translates and brings into shape so to say.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Friedrich Zettl Fine Arts

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading