Daoist Talks (II): The Basics

Daoism in Chinese Painting

How can Daoist ideas help us look at Chinese painting? In this second talk, I want to move from the stories of the first article towards the brushwork, space and movement of a picture. My particular interest is xieyi: painting in which what is suggested can matter as much as what is described.

Explore the complete Daoist Talks series.

Returning to the First Talk

In the first talk, Zhuangzi’s butterfly dream and my goldfish asked us to reconsider the position of the observer. What do we bring to an image when we name its forms? And what happens when those forms begin to slip away? These questions are more useful to my painting than a formula claiming that everything is simply “nothing”.

The Topic of the Series

This is an approach through painting, rather than a dictionary of philosophical terms. Definitions have their place, but a definition of Dao alone will not tell us how a brushstroke moves or why an empty area feels alive.

Readers may wonder why I write about Daoism and then bring in Zen, Buddhism or Confucianism. We love our little boxes of “-isms”—from eclecticism to rheumatism. Yet individual works and artists need not fit neatly inside them. These traditions have different histories and ideas, while Chinese painting has drawn on more than one of them. I would not label every great Chinese painter a Daoist.

Zhuangzi on Dao

In chapter twenty-two of the Zhuangzi, someone asks where Dao can be found. The answer moves through deliberately ordinary examples, including an ant and a roof tile: it is not confined to elevated things.[1] For me, that is an invitation to look closely at what is already before us.

I see a relationship here with questions that also interest me in Zen: how we distinguish observer and observed, and how practice can change that relationship. This is a point of contact in my own reading, not a claim that Daoism and Zen are interchangeable.

Gongbi and Xieyi: Two Approaches to Chinese Painting

A useful distinction is between gongbi (工笔), with its meticulous handling of line and detail, and xieyi (写意), a freer, more suggestive approach. These are broad ways of working, not two sealed compartments containing all Chinese art. My focus here is xieyi.

The two characters help explain my interest: xie means to write; yi points towards idea, meaning or intention. In this approach, the brush does more than record an outline. Its pressure, speed and rhythm belong to the expression. The close relationship with calligraphy helps explain why a painter may speak of “writing” a picture.[2]

For me, yi also concerns what holds the whole painting together. A tree should have more than a recognisable shape: the strokes should give us a sense of its presence. That takes practice. A brushstroke that looks effortless need not have been easy.

Daoism in Chinese Art: Nature, Yin and Yang

My working definition is this: Daoist ideas can help a painter give form to the relationships and processes of nature. The painter is part of those processes, rather than an observer standing entirely outside them.

Yin and yang are particularly useful to think with. They are complementary aspects of changing relationships, not simply good and bad or two forces locked in combat. Chapter forty-two of the Daodejing connects the “ten thousand things” with yin, yang and the harmonising action of qi.[3] In a painting, I look for such relationships in light and dark, density and openness, movement and rest. These are ways of attending to the picture, rather than a code that every work must obey.

Chinese and Western Approaches to Nature in Art

The comparison below puts a small figure in Shitao’s landscape beside the prominent figure in Caspar David Friedrich’s Wanderer above the Sea of Fog. I read the first as an invitation to enter the landscape and the second as an encounter with someone looking out across it. The contrast interests me, but two paintings cannot stand for all Chinese and Western attitudes to nature.

A landscape can also lead the eye through several areas without fixing us at a single viewpoint. I am interested in that wandering movement: how one passage opens into another and how brushwork carries the eye across apparently empty space. I discuss composition further in The Essence of Chinese Painting (III).

Poetry and Music

Painting, calligraphy and poetry have long been closely connected in literati art. Music, including the guqin, belongs to the wider world of cultivated practice that interests me here. These connections help explain why the painted image was not always treated as a self-contained object.

The Confucian ideal of the junzi, a cultivated and ethically responsible person, also informed that world. Scholar-painters could distinguish their work sharply from commercial painting. That historical claim to status should not become a rule that wealth or occupation determines whether someone can understand art.

Su Shi’s Wood and Rock is one striking example of the value later placed on literati painting. Christie’s sold it in Hong Kong in November 2018 for HK$463.6 million, including the buyer’s premium—about US$59.5 million.[4] The price is a market result, not a measure of how deeply any particular viewer experiences the painting.

One final term: wu wei (無為), often translated as non-action or effortless action. In my painting practice, I associate it with working without forcing a result. This does not mean doing nothing or dispensing with skill. It means becoming responsive enough to let a stroke develop without imposing a rigid plan on every movement.

Two Further Examples

In the album leaf by Yun Shouping below, I am drawn to the relationship between the two banks and the open water. The accompanying diagram suggests how I read that movement through yin and yang. It is a compositional interpretation, not proof that the painter intended to reproduce the familiar symbol.

Dong Qichang’s landscape offers a more complex route. The mountains, paths and trees resist being taken in at once. Rather than looking for a hidden philosophical label, try following the shifts of density and the spaces between the forms. Where does your eye pause, and where does it find a way through?


Footnotes

[1] See Zhuangzi, chapter 22: Knowledge Rambling in the North, Chinese Text Project. ↩

[2] For the connection between calligraphy, expression and scholar-painting, see Chinese Painting, The Metropolitan Museum of Art. My account here is a painter’s introduction, not an exhaustive classification. ↩

[3] See Daodejing, chapter 42. ↩

[4] Christie’s: Wood and Rock by Su Shi. The result refers to the 2018 sale, not a current valuation. ↩


Related articles: Daoist Talks (I): Zhuangzi’s Butterfly Dream in Ink Painting · Xieyi Painting · Daoist Talks: Series Index

Explore Art & Writing

Art Portfolio → Featured Artworks → Arts & Philosophy Journal → All Articles

Explore Asian Art Essays for writing on Chinese painting, calligraphy, aesthetics and art history.

Available Artworks

Original works are available on FriedrichZettl.com and Saatchi Art


Posted

in

by

Comments

30 responses to “Daoist Talks (II): The Basics”

  1. Edith avatar

    Heut habe ich am Geschriebenen zu knappern, da ich mich noch nie so tief in diese Materie eingearbeitet habe. Aber ich bin dran! Hausaufgaben sozusagen, lächel..
    Feine Wochenendstunden dir ganz herzlich.

    1. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

      Ja, ist etwas schwierig zu Beginn. Aber ich denke, dass nicht nur Maler was davon haben, die chin. Literatur funktioniert gleich. Ich werde einmal einen Artikel dazu posten, wenn ein paar grundsaetzliche Punkte abgehandelt sind. Schoenes WE!

      1. Edith avatar

        ❤

      2. Edith avatar

        Danke…

  2. swabby429 avatar

    Thank you for elaborating upon the Dao and Wu Wei in painting.

    1. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

      I thank you for reading! I hope I can express myself clearly.

      1. swabby429 avatar

        The lesson is easy to understand.

      2. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

        Thank you very much! Sometimes I am not sure.

  3. JMN avatar

    The glowering raven is splendid! Your discussion is illuminating. I’m fascinated by the prestige accorded calligraphy that you mention.

    1. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

      Thank you very much! It really means a lot to me as I am often not sure if my readers know what I am talking about. After a couple of posts things will become clearer.

  4. Ashley avatar

    There is much to take in here, a great deal to learn! Thank you! Would say then that I should study and practice calligraphy before painting?

    1. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

      Thank you! Well, if you want to paint following Chinese thoughts you have to. Please read my following postings and you will clearly understand. Good luck!

  5. Rosaliene Bacchus avatar

    Thanks for this informative article on Daoism in Chinese painting. There’s a lot to take in. Does the calligraphy in Chinese art provide a deeper understanding of its inferior visual component? Am I wrong in concluding that the propagation of Daoism through the visual arts is similar to that done through the early Christian paintings? Indeed, in modern Western art, the emphasis may not be on evoking a spiritual experience, but rather, in many cases, in calling attention to the human condition. Considering the current degradation of nature, we in the Western world could benefit from exploring new artistic forms that help us to become one with nature and the universe. Then again, our perception of a work of art depends upon our individual sense of being.

    1. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

      Thank you very much! As for calligraphy, maybe I’ll do an own post about it one day, but I think it’s very difficult because it’s too complex a subject that requires a lot of basic knowledge from the reader. But everything I write about it now, from the dot to the stroke to the composition, applies equally to calligraphy – just on a higher level,.

      As for the comparison with early Christian paintings, the most significant difference for me is that the Western painters were craftsmen commissioned to create images intended to represent the canon of Christian doctrine: Jesus, Mary, Apostles… In conjunction with symbols (Cross, Stations of the Cross, Washing of Feet) they illustrated a teaching with people in the center. The Daoists did not illustrate and deify, but “created” nature by applying the principles of nature.
      Yes, the Western Green Parties could take a lot of inspiration from Daoism. However, we live in a materialistic, money-dominated world order and not even today’s Chinese government can cope with this very idealistic world view.

      1. Rosaliene Bacchus avatar

        Now I’m intrigued about the use of calligraphy! I sense that writing to the Daoist is much more than mere words/symbols but an expression of the spirit/soul of the writer/artist. I find the religious masterpieces of the Flemish artist Paul Rubens (1577-1640) and Italian Michelangelo Caravaggio (1571-1610) very emotive. Indeed, it is the reality of our modern world that the more inferior (xiao ren) merchant class has taken control of our lives. I believe that the work of our artists (the junzi) who seek to depict and express the nobler nature of humanity keeps us from falling into the abyss.

  6. Martha Kennedy avatar

    I’d be a poor Taoist if I said anything. Ooops…

    1. Kamran Alam Khan avatar

      Don’t be silent for the sake of being a Daoist. This effort also violates the Dao.

  7. annieasksyou avatar

    This is enlightening material, Friedrich; I’m grateful for your guidance. I was especially taken by learning the centrality of calligraphy. Also most enjoyable was your description of the viewer’s eye freed to move about the painting.

    Such a welcome change from my political obsession!

    1. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

      Thank you, Annie, that makes me very happy! Sometimes we need something to unwind and art is certainly a fitting area. The immense importance that calligraphy has in Chinese art is initially very difficult for the western viewer to appreciate. A blog post or two would only scratch the surface. But everything that is now discussed can be applied to calligraphy, also that our eyes can wander into it.

  8. julianeus avatar

    Cool!

    1. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

      Thank you! There is more to come.

  9. Auden James avatar

    An insightful article! Though brief to the point of being almost opaque at times, there gleam and shine forth parts of it that make me think that some Western traditions⁠—or, at least, ideas⁠⁠—in aesthetics might not be entirely antithetical to the Eastern⁠—or, more specifically⁠, Chinese—ways.

    What piqued my interest especially was the Daoist conception of the role of character in the creation (and perception) of “high art” which requires “high thoughts,” wherefore the Daoist artist (and connoisseur) is set to work on her character and towards a better understanding. I mean—whereby I may be trying to naïvely jump an insurmountable abyss here—isn’t there a touch of the Aristotelian in this line of thought?

  10. Carolyn Kaiser Harmon avatar

    Friedrich: I have SO much to learn in life and from you. I will read more about Daoism in your blog posts. And then, I will get back to you with some feedback and hopefully something smart to say. Thank you ❤️

    1. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

      You are so kind, Carolyn! Thank you ❤️

  11. The Golden Tears avatar

    Wonderful post, I’m currently reading Lao-tzu’s Taoteching translated by Red Pine, Freidrich which version do you use as their are many, I also found Zhuangzi: The Complete Writings by Brook Ziporyn, I’d like to read that as well. Alex

    1. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

      Great to hear, good luck! Don’t worry too much if it is hard to understand at the beginning. If we manage to pick up certain thoughts we should be happy. And then, by and by we can adept more and more. As for versions: I probably have 7-8. As I am German speaking most books are in German and Richard Wilhelm is the best one for me. In any case it should be a translation by someone who can deal with the Chinese language. Some just translate translations. 🙂 Zhuangzi is easier – still mysterious enough 😃🌻

      1. The Golden Tears avatar

        Thank you for your reply, I try not to take philosophy on face value and I have heard of Richard Wilhelm, if only I new Chinese but even then translators have been struggling with the original text for centuries. Zhuangzi take on the Dao is more user friendly in that way.

      2. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

        Definitely! All in all, all translations that I know of are suitable for a start. First of all, it is about understanding yin and yang, the nothing – just basic things.

  12. Kamran Alam Khan avatar

    Yes there is nothing which is outside Dao. The matrix, the mystery, the incomprehensible including me saying this in all my totality is Dao. Yes the creation is itself the creator. There is no dualism. Thank you for beautiful paintings.❣️🙏

  13. Zettl Fine Arts avatar

    I thank you! And I am very happy to see that our concepts match ❣️🙏

Leave a Reply