Art, Morality and the Common Good
Emperor Huizong (宋徽宗, 1082–1135) [1]: after the aesthetics of imperfection and beauty in ugliness, I want to return to a very different kind of beauty. Huizong’s paintings and calligraphy still move me. Admiring them does not mean admiring monarchy, or imagining a better world in the past. His life makes the relationship between artistic sensitivity and political responsibility especially difficult to ignore.
Today, many world leaders behave like emperors again or are revered as such, significantly impacting global societies. In our interconnected world, the actions of immoral rulers ripple across nations, influencing lives far beyond their borders.
Before looking closely at his art, it helps to consider what Chinese emperorship claimed to be.
The Emperor as the Son of Heaven
In ancient China, the emperor was more than just a political leader; he was a central, almost mythical figure. As the Son of Heaven, he acted as the link between heaven and earth [2]. His rule was legitimized through the concept of the Mandate of Heaven (天命, Tiānmìng), granting him divine authority while demanding moral integrity and dedication to the welfare of his people.
In this ideal, the ruler was responsible for harmony between Heaven, earth and humanity. Two related terms need distinguishing: li (禮/礼) concerns ritual propriety and appropriate conduct; tianxia (天下), “all under Heaven,” refers to the realm or a wider conception of the world. Neither term guarantees that an actual emperor governed justly. They describe expectations against which rule could be judged.
The Mandate of Heaven: A Mechanism for Renewal
The Mandate of Heaven was not understood as an unconditional right to power. Disasters, famine and disorder could be interpreted as signs that a ruler had lost Heaven’s favour. These were political and moral interpretations of events, rather than evidence that a ruler’s virtue controlled nature. [3]
The loss of the mandate could be used to justify a change of dynasty. Geming (革命), now the word for “revolution,” originally referred to changing the mandate: 革 (ge) means change, and 命 (ming) means mandate. This was a language of legitimacy, often used to explain why one ruling house had replaced another. [2]
Emperor Huizong: Art as a Mirror of the Times
Emperor Huizong was a painter, calligrapher, collector and patron who made the arts central to his court. His reign, from 1100 to 1126, brought ambitious cultural projects as well as political conflict. The refinement of the surviving works makes the catastrophe at the end of his reign all the more striking.
His collections and commissions brought painting, poetry, calligraphy and antiquarian scholarship together. Art also belonged to the public image of his rule: an auspicious bird or an extraordinary stone could be presented as a sign of Heaven’s favour. [1]
Huizong has often been portrayed as an artist whose absorption in beauty made him neglect government. That explanation is too simple on its own. Patricia Buckley Ebrey’s biography presents an ambitious ruler whose cultural, religious and political projects were closely entangled. He abdicated in 1126; the Jurchen Jin captured Kaifeng in 1127 and took him prisoner. He died in captivity in 1135. The Northern Song ended, while the dynasty continued in the south. [4]
Emperor Huizong: Art and Daoist Kingship
For me, one of the most fascinating aspects of Huizong is the place Daoism occupied in his life. It was more than a private source of inspiration: he promoted Daoist teachings and an image of sacred kingship. It would therefore be misleading to describe his relationship with Confucianism, Daoism and Buddhism simply as a peaceful harmony of the three. Religious ideas and the exercise of power were inseparable here. [5]
What interests me in Auspicious Dragon Stone is the meeting of exact observation and imaginative transformation. The perforated rock remains a rock, yet its rising and twisting form suggests a dragon. The Palace Museum explains that Huizong treated such unusual stones as auspicious signs. The painting’s beauty and its political meaning coexist. [1]
Huizong’s Calligraphy Achievements
Huizong’s distinctive “Slender Gold” script (瘦金體/瘦金体) combines fine strokes with sharp turns and emphatic endings. Its apparent fragility is held together by remarkable control. Looking from these written lines to the bamboo leaves, I am reminded how closely painting and calligraphy can meet. (Painted Calligraphy Series →)
At the same time, his mastery of the expressive Grass Script (cao shu 草書) demonstrates his artistic versatility. [6]
His bird-and-flower paintings invite close attention to living things. In Finches and Bamboo, the two small birds seem alert and present rather than merely decorative. Auspicious Cranes brings nature into an explicitly imperial setting, with cranes circling above the palace roof.
Listening to the Qin offers another image of cultivated imperial life. The central musician is generally identified as Huizong. Although the work bears his title and signature, the Palace Museum discusses it as a painting made by a court artist, rather than an undisputed self-portrait. For me, its stillness is more persuasive than any claim about the emperor’s inner life: the listeners’ postures make the unheard music almost tangible. [1]
Emperor Huizong and His Artists’ Circle
Huizong surrounded himself with artists, poets and scholars. Imagine the highest political figure in your country taking such an active interest in painting and calligraphy. He strengthened court artistic training and established a formal painting school in 1104. This should be distinguished from saying that he founded the entire older tradition of the imperial painting academy. [4]
A much later example comes to mind. In my bedroom hang four bamboo scrolls attributed to Zuo Zongtang (左宗棠), the Qing statesman and general. Their inscriptions invoke the prestige of Hanlin membership. I would not treat that title as evidence of a direct institutional line from Huizong’s painting school. What interests me is the enduring association between official status, scholarship and the brush.
Huizong’s reign overlapped with the lives of major painters and calligraphers such as Mi Fu (米芾, 1052–1107) and Li Gonglin (李公麟, 1049–1106). Their different practices remind me that Song art cannot be reduced to a single court style or a shared political outlook.
Emperor Huizong’s Enduring Legacy
Huizong’s importance rests in both the works associated with him and the collections, commissions and training he supported. The arts already carried intellectual and spiritual meaning before his reign; he did not invent that role. He gave it a particularly visible imperial form.
The association of political authority with cultivated brushwork continued long after the Song. Even Mao Zedong, so often likened to a modern “emperor,” practised an expressive cursive calligraphy. To my eye, its force is unmistakable. Yet the ability to write or paint beautifully is no guarantee of humane government. That is the uncomfortable question Huizong leaves with me.
A Personal Anecdote: Meeting the Chinese Emperor
Originally, I considered using the subtitle “When I Met the Chinese Emperor” for this article. While it might seem attention-grabbing or even misleading, it isn’t entirely inaccurate! Here’s why:
Most readers are likely familiar with Bernardo Bertolucci’s acclaimed 1987 film, The Last Emperor. The film portrays the life of Emperor Pu Yi in three phases, with different actors playing him at each stage. Tijger Tsou portrayed Pu Yi in his youth.
Years ago, during one of my earliest cultural projects, I invited Tijger Tsou from the United States to Vienna. He was the guest of honour at a large raffle at the cultural event I organised. In this small way, I “met the last emperor” through the actor who brought Emperor Pu Yi’s youthful years to life. 😊
Footnotes
[1] Huizong, personal name Zhao Ji (趙佶), lived from 1082 to 1135. For the works illustrated here, see the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, on Five-Colored Parakeet; the Metropolitan Museum of Art on Finches and Bamboo; and the Palace Museum on Auspicious Dragon Stone and Listening to the Qin. Attributions and the emperor’s personal participation need to be considered work by work.
[2] The Mandate of Heaven linked legitimate rule to moral responsibility. For geming (革命), see the Key Concepts in Chinese Thought and Culture termbase: 革 means change; 命 refers to the mandate or ruling authority.
[3] Auspicious signs and disasters belonged to the language through which imperial legitimacy was asserted or questioned. They should not be read here as objective proof of a ruler’s virtue. The MFA’s account of Five-Colored Parakeet explains the bird’s meaning as an auspicious tribute at Huizong’s court.
[4] Patricia Buckley Ebrey, Emperor Huizong (Harvard University Press, 2014). On the painting school established in 1104, see Ebrey’s discussion in A Companion to Chinese Art.
[5] Richard J. Sage, “Messianic Deity and Daoist Sage–Ruler: Song Huizong’s Commentaries on the Daoist Classics”, Asia Major 36.2 (2023), pp. 115–46, examines the political role of his Daoist commentaries.
[6] The cursive Thousand Character Classic is held by the Liaoning Provincial Museum. The illustration shows details of the long handscroll. It demonstrates a very different movement of the brush from the controlled angularity of Slender Gold script.
Related articles
Criticism: Not Amused with the Emperor · Mu Qi’s Six Persimmons: An Interpretation · Painted Calligraphy Series: Text as Texture
Explore Art & Writing
Art Portfolio → Featured Artworks → Arts & Philosophy Journal → All Articles
Explore Asian Art Essays for writing on Chinese painting, calligraphy, aesthetics and art history.
Available Artworks
Original works are available on FriedrichZettl.com and Saatchi Art
Leave a Reply