metaverse (IV)

Day & Night and Schrödinger’s Cat

Thank you for following these excursions into my metaverse. Today I want to look at day and night, and at something that matters increasingly in my painting: a form can suggest an object without becoming fixed as that object.

Does my metaverse even have day and night? I could say yes, no, or perhaps only in places with solar systems like ours. But those answers are less interesting to me than the question itself. Can a painting hold apparently opposing possibilities together?

Schrödinger’s Cat

Schrödinger’s cat comes to mind, although the comparison needs care. In 1935, Erwin Schrödinger used the imagined cat to expose the difficulty of applying quantum superposition to an everyday object.[1] It is not a scientific explanation of day and night in a painting, nor a demonstration that Zen and quantum mechanics say the same thing.

What attracts me is the disturbance of an easy either/or. Shunryu Suzuki’s writing on body and mind also asks us to reconsider such divisions.[2] For my purposes, these are different sources of questions. I do not need to turn one into proof of the other.

My knowledge of quantum mechanics is modest. And although a Zen painting struck me powerfully when I first encountered one, roughly fifty years before writing this in 2022, I would not call myself a Zen Buddhist. These interests have nevertheless stayed with me and shaped how I look at a painted mark.

When I began this project, I decided to understand “metaverse” as a metaphor. Day and night can therefore become metaphors too. The following descriptions should be read with a little humour. I am letting the images suggest a world, not drawing up its laws.

A typical morning in my metaverse might look like this. With the first rays of light, its animated forms seem to stir, play and gather energy for the day. Or that is how I see them this morning. What do I know?

Night

Evening and night are a little closer to what we know. The day’s last thoughts recede, leaving room for the hours when the subconscious entertains us. Some of the original’s nuances and depth are lost on a screen.

Look at the suggested creatures. Is that a bird, and that a fish? The marks remain open enough to be seen otherwise. A fish and a not-quite-fish can inhabit the same shape. This is pictorial ambiguity, rather than quantum superposition.

Someone might object that this is simply what abstract painting does. Yes—but I enjoy the point at which the painting is abstract and not entirely abstract. Something recognizable appears, then slips away. I do not want to settle it too quickly.

Bonus Material: Other Beginnings

In the previous post, I chose a dragon/chaos image to suggest a beginning. I had painted several versions. This earlier one has qualities I like, but it seemed too abstract for that particular role: even the dragon would be difficult to recognize.

Another attempt treated the beginning as an ecstatic event. Yet too much already seems to have taken shape for it to feel like the very beginning. It belongs somewhere further along in my imagined world.

Extra Bonus Material: Something to Listen To

For many years, one of my favourite records was Tony Scott’s Music for Zen Meditation, made with Japanese musicians. I offer it here as a personal listening suggestion. It has accompanied my interest in these questions for a long time.


Footnotes

[1] Schrödinger’s 1935 thought experiment concerns a cat whose fate is linked to a quantum event. It raises the problem of how a superposition relates to definite outcomes at a macroscopic scale. See the Nobel Prize’s explanation in its 2012 physics background. ↩

[2] Shunryu Suzuki, Zen Mind, Beginner’s Mind. My original reference was the German edition, Zen-Geist, Anfänger-Geist, Theseus, 2016, p. 26, discussing body and mind as both two and one. See also the San Francisco Zen Center’s introduction to the book. ↩

Related articles

Metaverse (III): The Beginning and the End · Metaverse (V) · Cats in Chinese Painting

Explore Art & Writing

Art Portfolio → Featured Artworks → Arts & Philosophy Journal → All Articles

Explore Asian Art Essays for writing on Chinese painting, calligraphy, aesthetics and art history.

Available Artworks

Original works are available on FriedrichZettl.com and Saatchi Art


Posted

in

by

Comments

21 responses to “metaverse (IV)”

  1. AT SUNNYSIDE - WHERE TRUTH AND BEAUTY MEET avatar

    Thought provoking, as always. Thanks for the Zen jokes, too. 😎

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you very much! Artists have to be provoking – part of the business plan 😄 Glad you enjoyed the jokes.

  2. swabby429 avatar

    I’ve studied some Dzogchen, which is similar to Zen. Both contain crazy wisdom showing that conceptual thinking is tricky.

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Right! It makes one think a lot. Especially as we so often think we know it all 😄

  3. chris ludke avatar

    That is amazing! I understand some of it because I know things are not as they seem. Like concrete is moving on a subatomic level and it looks solid but it is breaking down. When you paint these do you have a plan for how it will look finished or are you going with the flow with the idea to see how it turns out?

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Hard to answer. When it comes to a themed series like this, the process is: I think a lot about the concept and what it’s actually about. (Concept and composition are the most important for me). This can also happen when walking in nature…. I limit that more and more, so that a narrow “topic” remains – depending on my mood. I often do simple studies, e.g. trying out and (sometimes) committing to certain colors or techniques. When I then start painting (I usually meditate beforehand), I try to have an empty head. At the moment I’m at the point where the less I work with my head, the more spirited the paintings become.

      And one of my most important working-tools is music. I’ve been listening to Arvo Pärt a lot lately. His music is extremely inspirational. But there were also times when I mainly listened to Brian Eno. And Bach of course…..

      1. chris ludke avatar

        Thanks! You’re giving me an inspiration here.

  4. Zettl Friedrich avatar

    Thank you! Being an experienced painter, you know that these things cannot easily be expressed in words. Each of us has our experiences and certain stuff on our minds. Some of it we need, others we should leave out when painting….

  5. chris ludke avatar

    Yeah. They told us in art school, “Don’t clean the cobwebs out of your brain on the canvas, no one wants to see that.” But people who are interested in psyche want to know what makes a person into an artist. So how can I draw the line when doing an abstract?

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      You must become the line, a Zen master might have told you 😄

      1. chris ludke avatar

        hahahahaha! You cracking me up here! Thanks!

  6. Martha Kennedy avatar

    I love the jokes. I love your paintings. Forgive me, but the meta verse just seems to me like another abstract construction from a reality we don’t understand anyway. I’m looking at death all the time right now and I don’t know why, but it’s a great simplifier. In my mind is a Japanese poem and I can’t find it anywhere, but someone asks a Zen master what he would miss when he died and he answers that he will miss the sky. When it comes to reality, mystery seems to me to be the governing principle. All the hours I spend out there in the Big Empty with the dogs? I know where I am; the rest of the time just seems like a lot of made-up human drama. We name everything, we humans, and forget that the name is just a convenience so we can tell someone else about it — it has nothing at all to do with the intrinsic nature of the thing unless it’s descriptive but even then? “Green earth from the limestone boulders in Veneto.” Meaningless, but the pigment itself is real. So… I’m just kind of dumb where these things are concerned, I guess, and that’s why I haven’t attempted to comment before.

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you for your detailed explanation! Wise words, as always, and I can relate to everything very well. Your “koan” with the Zen-master and heaven is just great!
      I would like to take up your question about metaverse. (I try to show MY own version in this series).

      In the M.Z.s metaverse, the following scenario would happen right now: you and I would not communicate like we do now, but would sit as avatars in a virtual coffee shop, drink virtual coffee and chat about the good old days when there was only internet. When I then pay, we laugh about the days when people still paid with pieces of metal, printed paper and plastic. I, on the other hand, pay for the coffee with virtual money (which I previously exchanged for hard-earned fiat money).

      After our conversation you go out and satisfy your shopping cravings, buy cool sunglasses and a must-have handbag at the hip shop with an Italian name to make your friends jealous… Everything virtual, but everything with payment transactions and everything in a blockchain system.
      By then, a large number of people had already earned money: the designers of the avatars (completely new dimension, adapted to wishes), the operators of the coffee shop…..but before that the brokers who rented this shop (virtually)….

      But I don’t know yet if you can take your dogs with you, probably also in the form of avatars.

      I haven’t figured out what I’m actually should be looking for there. A gamer’s paradise, well. A paradise to build appearances and mold them with money, well. Really seeing all my online friends now – God forbid!

      1. Martha Kennedy avatar

        Thank you. Now I know I DO understand what the Metaverse is. Honestly, I have enough trouble struggling with alleged reality. Sometime in 1993 I was riding my bike with a friend and we came whooping down a hill and I saw the light of the sun behind a hill, a halo of colors and it hit me “What’s real anyway?” THAT is a dangerous question. I had my breakdown after that.

        We live in a world of consensual reality that serves as a buffer against the real thing. I see it all the time in myself and those around me who “respond” to me with their expectations (as I am probably doing, too). It’s a paper doll world. Alan Watts wrote about it so beautifully describing real vs. symbolic wealth. Anyway, thank you.

        It’s like the paradox of the Klein bottle. My dad was showing me all this cool topology stuff including that and I wondered, “How is it a bottle if it can’t hold anything?” that was it. 🙂

      2. Zettl Friedrich avatar

        With that much of thinking and reflecting I wonder if M.Z. metaverse is the right thing for you 🙃 But there will be enough influencers who can kinda guide you there.

      3. Martha Kennedy avatar

        I think it’s better for me to stay out here in this “reality” with my canine avatars… It’s already weird enough. 😀

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you very much ❤️

  7. alicia | metasparks.blog avatar

    Very thought-provoking! Without the writings sharing the thought processes behind them, aesthetically, I like the works!

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you very much! I’m glad that you like my pictures! As far as the text is concerned, the main thing I try to do, of course, is to make my pictures easier to understand.

      1. alicia | metasparks.blog avatar

        Understood!

Leave a Reply