metaverse (III)

The Beginning and the End

A Short Preliminary Remark

Before starting, I can almost hear someone objecting: “That is not scientific!” Fair enough. My metaverse is a painter’s thought experiment. Buddhist and Daoist ideas help shape my understanding of being, but I am not offering them as conclusions proved by quantum physics.

We live with models and assumptions. A hundred-dollar banknote, for example, is worth far more to us than the material from which it is made. That comparison interests me because it shows how strongly our world is shaped by meanings we share. It is an analogy, not a reason to treat scientific evidence as merely another agreement.

My Model

The questions that draw me to cosmology are often the ones I cannot picture: what might “before the beginning” mean? What do we imagine when we speak of an end? The Big Bang model describes an expanding universe, not an explosion from a central point into surrounding empty space.[1] My paintings take those questions elsewhere, into an imagined space where I can give them a visible form.

I begin with chaos and move towards a provisional boundary. Words such as “epicentre” and “edge” belong to the geography of my painted world. They are not locations I am claiming for the physical universe.

Myths about the Origin of the World

For the first painting I chose the dragon as an image of creation and chaos. Mythological creatures offer a way to approach forces that are difficult to represent. I am borrowing that possibility rather than claiming that creation myths share one account of how the universe began.

Perhaps you can see the chaos but not the dragon. With a little imagination, its head appears near the upper left, with an elongated body and wing-like forms below. I am increasingly interested in the feeling or principle of a subject rather than its recognizable outline. Here, creator and chaos are still almost one.

Painting #2: A Couple of Miles before the End of Time

The second work approaches the opposite end of the spectrum, spatially and philosophically. I called it A Couple of Miles before the End of Time. For now, that is as far as I can go.

I like the questions in that title. Does my imagined world end when time ends? Is there something beyond what a chronometer measures? Could there be time without matter? I let these remain questions rather than pretending that a painting can settle them.

At first I considered a more diffuse image, something like a blurred galaxy. Instead, I chose a few separated forms. Most of the sheet remains unpainted. There is little concrete to hold on to, yet the forms pull towards one another and also suggest distance. I read that tension through yin and yang.

This is where physics and philosophy meet for me as sources of questions. The painting does not demonstrate a theory. Its empty areas make the question more immediate.

Painting #3: The First Signs of Order

The third painting remains near my imagined beginning, but chaos is starting to organize itself. Light and dark separate; forms acquire boundaries; a view into the distance becomes possible. Rounded, almost spherical shapes begin to appear.

Oskar Kokoschka was an important early influence on me. Later, Chinese painting brought the question of omission into even sharper focus.[2] How much can I leave out? How little can remain while a painting still has something to say?

These two earlier works approach that question differently. The second is a conversation in two broad strokes. Try telling a story with so little.

For me, the question is whether something still happens between the marks. Is there a story, a tension, a relationship? Until I can go further, I will leave those last miles before the end of time as a meeting place for painting, physics and philosophy.


Footnotes

[1] For the distinction between an explosion in space and the expansion of space itself, see NASA’s Big Bang questions and answers. ↩

[2] I discuss omission, unpainted space and related ideas in Asian Art Theories, especially Emptiness and the Meaning of White. ↩

Related articles

Metaverse Project (II) · Metaverse (IV): Day and Night · Emptiness and the Meaning of White

Explore Art & Writing

Art Portfolio → Featured Artworks → Arts & Philosophy Journal → All Articles

Explore Asian Art Essays for writing on Chinese painting, calligraphy, aesthetics and art history.

Available Artworks

Original works are available on FriedrichZettl.com and Saatchi Art


Posted

in

by

Comments

25 responses to “metaverse (III)”

  1. wolkenbeobachterin avatar

    i really like your drawings, the colours and energy. powerful, energetic. looks as if you gave some of your playful energy to the canvas.
    may i ask where you got the (red) stamp from? that one “to sign” your drawing. because i am looking for one for my drawings too, but could not find it anywhere.
    have a great sunday.

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you for your friendly words! As for the seals: I’ve certainly owned over 1000 over the years :). The majority is now in a museum, I only have 70-80 myself. I’ve also cut many myself and was quite good at it once. Some time ago I saw that you can have seals carved as you wish in China (alibaba shop?) It’s not expensive either. I’ll see if I can still find the link. Seals are a fine thing for painters: if you have not managed to balance well with the brush, you can help with the seals 🙂

      1. wolkenbeobachterin avatar

        oh thank you for looking for the link. that’ll be great to order it there. i see the seals as the last finish for my ink-drawings. have a great weekend! best regards from berlin.

      2. Zettl Friedrich avatar

        Ich habe mir Ihre Arbeiten angesehen, ja, 1-2 Siegel koennen die Arbeiten sicher bereichern.
        Es war nicht alibaba sondern taobao. Habe Sie schon Mal auf fleabay nachgesehen? (Engl. Version “chinese seal carving”). Da werden viele Siegel unterschiedlicher Art angeboten. Allerdings sind fast alle neueren Datums, aber das sollte ja kein Problem darstellen.
        Schoene Gruesse aus Wien!

      3. wolkenbeobachterin avatar

        ah, aus wien! vor ein paar jahren besuchte ich wien und es hat mir sehr gefallen. ich wußte nicht, von wo du/sie schreiben, da das posting in englischer sprache verfasst ist.
        vielen dank für die infos bezüglich der firmen. ich kenne keine der erwähnten seiten, werde aber mal schauen, ob ich fündig werde.
        danke fürs besuchen meiner seite auch.
        schöne grüße zurück!

      4. Zettl Friedrich avatar

        Als ich das letzte Mal in Ihrer schoenen Stadt Berlin war, war Checkpoint Charly noch in Amt und Wuerden 🙂

      5. wolkenbeobachterin avatar

        das ist schon ein paar tage her. 🙂

  2. swabby429 avatar

    I’m glad you pointed out the dragon’s head. Seeing it, gave me clues to understanding the remainder of your illustrated essay.

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you! I will continue with that in my following posts, hoping some points become clearer by and by. The play with thoughts and the playing with brushes idealistically would become one at some point – idealistically 😄

      1. swabby429 avatar

        Sometimes just a gentle nudge helps us.

  3. BACK ROADS AND OTHER STORIES avatar

    Interesting. I can feel my brain stretching in five different directions. My biggest takeaway from this post is that one sentence “The most difficult thing in painting is omitting“, and I love the two stroke painting!

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you so much for your kind words! Surely you know the term Enso. As a painter, you only have one line of your own to tell the world how far you have come in your thinking, experience… That’s quite a tedious task and exercise.

  4. chris ludke avatar

    I’m a big fan of your paintings! I never studied the theories you have in mind but these kind of give me an idea and if you show them without the text people will still pick up the vibe.
    Did you ever hear the theory that our Big Bang universe started when another universe got sucked into a black hole and popped up on this side?

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you for your kind words! No, I’ve never heard of this theory! Don’t tell me about it or I’ll start a new series right away. 🙂

      But seriously, and this is primarily aimed at you, because we have already started talking about this topic before: I think that for you as a painter there will be a few things in the coming postings. The matter is more difficult for Westerners, but I will try to close this gap a bit in my next posting with some comparisons.

      1. chris ludke avatar

        OH! Great! Thanks! I’m looking forward to it!

  5. annieasksyou avatar

    This is all so interesting! I appreciate your explanations of the thinking and theory behind your work—and the works stimulate my imagination. So glad you found my blog, so that I can enjoy and learn from yours!

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thanks! I’m very happy to hear that and hope to show more that you enjoy. I thought long and hard about whether I should also write something about it, because a lot of things may sound very confusing.

  6. florentboucharel avatar

    As always, very interesting. Physics is a limited field with no grasp on ultimate questions. The two questions you are asking are basically Kantian so-called antinomies. The Big Bang is no answer to an ultimate question, only a working hypothesis inside the limited field of physics; of course it makes no sense, outside this limited field, to talk of an absolute beginning of the totality of things, that is, of “the world,” by physical ways. The expansion we observe may have been started by an initial explosion but that still could not be an absolute start of the cosmos as in the very terms of physics we cannot think of something entirely new in nature (“nothing is lost, nothing is created, everything is transformed”), so we are touching here an intrinsic contradiction of physics. On the one hand physics is limited to natural phenomena and its axiom is “nothing is lost etc”, on the other hand it claims to be able to deal also with the totality of natural phenomena of which we have no experience whatsoever and when it talks of a big bang, this might be a valid explanation for a natural phenomenon such as the formation of a local region of the totality but can never claim to satisfy the mind as far as the totality of things are concerned because it violates the very postulates it is based upon whenever it claims to deal with the totality of things rather than with- particular things themselves, their totality being no object of our experience (the world remains a guiding idea). Physics cannot prove or disprove metaphysics. The only claim scientism can make in this regard is that there is no metaphysics to start with. Now, as far as quantum physics is concerned, it must be stressed that the so-called “Copenhagen consensus,” according to which uncertainty or indetermination (from Heisenberg’s principle of uncertainty or indetermination) is in the nature itself rather than in the scientific apprehension of it smacks of pure ideology: physicists claim nature is indeterminate in order to salvage science as a relevant instrument of knowledge. In other words “it’s not science’s fault but nature’s”…

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you very, very much for taking the time and trouble to reply in such detail and so precisely! As far as I can see, our views on this are basically the same. Unfortunately, I’m not a physicist (my son is) and I’m not as familiar with western philosophy as you are. My starting point is (Asian) art with its philosophical superstructure. I’m always amazed at how similar quantum physics and Zen Buddhism are. Of course, my short contributions are not scientific work, but should help to reflect on my way of painting. I also have to consider that there is a big difference in knowledge among readers and I’m not getting too academic. This medium is not suitable for this.

      1. florentboucharel avatar

        Thank you. Yes, I think our views converge. I would like to add one thing for the sake of precision: the axiom I talked of (“nothing is lost etc”) comes from chemistry (Lavoisier) rather than physics proper, yet for some reason we talk of “astrophysics” rather than “astrochemistry,” which it is at this stage, and that’s the reason why I put it under the physics label, that is, in fact, hard science.

      2. Zettl Friedrich avatar

        Thanks again! I did not want to touch chemistry due to lack in appropriate knowledge but yes, astrochemistry sounds good. So much yet to learn for me 😄

  7. rabirius avatar

    I especially like the more minimalist works. It focuses the imagination.
    But the others are great too.

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you! I did more of those paintings and some I will introduce in my next postings. For now I am chosing those images which fit best to the text which might be hard to understand sometimes.

    1. Zettl Friedrich avatar

      Thank you very much!

Leave a Reply